|
March 17, 2006
|

Funded by the National Science Foundation
Office of Polar Programs |
Location: Latitude 63° 20.3' S, Longitude 52° 22.4' W
Air Temperature: 1.3°C
Flexibility
You have to be flexible on a ship at sea: the
nearest Radio Shack is several thousand miles
away. Though everyone tries to have spare parts
available, it is impossible to stock everything
or predict every potential failure. A broken part
could render an expensive scientific instrument
inoperable, or at very least, inefficient. Such
was the prospect yesterday when a laser switch
stopped functioning in the Multi-Sensor Core
Logger (MSCL).
In brief, the MSCL is proof that man's principle
advantage over beast is the consistent quest for
laziest solution - the easy way to do things. The
MSCL combines a number of instruments for core
analysis in to one highly-automated machine,
allowing one or two people to run a set of
measurements that might otherwise require a small
army. The instruments include a gamma-ray
impedance detector (for density) and a
high-resolution camera (for core imaging). The
instruments are next to a track of rails on which
the core sections are placed. Each section is
pushed past the instruments by a motorized
belt-drive pusher. A laser beam-break switch is
used to sense the beginning and end of each core
section, so that the measurements may be
accurately correlated to position in the core
section and thus, to position below ground.
Fortunately, all of the instruments have been
working well. Unfortunately, the sensor part of
the laser switch completely stopped functioning
yesterday.
After a time spent checking things on the
software side, I called in the big guns, in the
form of Dan Elsberg. Dan is an electronics tech,
and knows circuits much better than I do. He
pulled out diagrams and cable pinouts, and we
began to troubleshoot the hardware-software
interface. Everything worked right except for the
laser sensor - it did not produce the expected
electrical change to drive the rest of the logic
circuit and signal to the computer that the beam
was "unbroken." Without this signal, the software
never has a starting point, because the beam is
supposed to only be broken when something -
usually a core section - is in the light path.
Figuring out the problem was a good start, but
only part of a solution. We needed to find a
replacement . . . Thus began our parts odyssey.
First, to the parts bins in the electrical shop -
nothing. Next, to the aptly named "hobby room."
This room is a large walk-in closet filled to
capacity with drawers and shelves lined with
bags, boxes, and bins containing parts for all
sorts of instruments, the computer systems,
sonar, radios, TVs, and other assorted systems
that we run. But alas, no luck. We did not find
anything close to the desired phototransistor.
At this point, we decided to resort to
cannibalism. For a while, we discussed stealing
parts from an old TV-VCR combo. But first, we
took apart a broken palm pilot, several floppy
disk drives, as well as raiding a box of printer
parts. Nothing. Then, a little creature came to
mind - the mouse connected to each computer. In
the process of computer upgrade and replacement,
we have managed to end up with a large collection
of excess computer mice - especially the fancy
new optical ones. We took to one of these with
screwdriver and soldering iron, to see what we
might find. Disassembly showed promise, as the
mouse had two light sensors inside of it: one for
motion, and one for the little scroll wheel
between the mouse buttons. The motion sensor was
built in to a complicated microchip that would
never be useable without schematics. But, the
scroll-wheel sensor looked like it just might
work. Using a voltmeter and a flashlight, Dan
checked to see if the sensor worked as hoped. It
did! But, when we tested the sensor with the
original laser, a letdown. Laser light consists
of photons at a single wavelength (from a
practical standpoint, color). Though sensitive to
some of the many wavelengths from a flashlight,
the new sensor was not sensitive to the specific
wavelength of the laser.
This was a roadblock, but we realized that the
sensor might work as needed with a different
light source. Though finding one should have been
simple, nothing except the flashlight would work
because the light needed to be focused properly.
So, we decided to try running the system with a
flashlight. This worked for a while, but later in
the day, the system was switched to a microscope
light fixture. Light from this source is more
focused, and unlike the flashlight, will not
require new batteries every few hours.
The attached pictures may not be aesthetically
pleasing to most. To a tinkering soul however,
the solution borders on art.
Most importantly, the logger works!
-Isaiah Norton


Do you have questions? Comments?
Contact us
|